, , , , ,

It has to be based on the needs, which the products satisfy.The effect of the products.

So i call this system L which stands for life.

There will be 2 sides:

α)People will determine what the products can satisfy. As scintifically as possible.
Ω)People will determine what they need. As scientifically as possible.

This seems impossible in the first glare, but it’s not!!
Because the work to determine all of that, will reduce exponentially.
Because everybody needs certain but rather similar things & they roughly know why.

First this currency will roughly describe what we need & what products serve.
After time the definitions will enhance & get more & more detailled.

As you know by now this currency will never describe all possible functions of any product.
Not just because of variancs, side effects, alternative uses, uses over time & little details,
but just because this is a trait of reality. It’s relatively infinite.
That’s the way we describe reality in science anyways.

A big point regarding groceries will be,
that we will describe the products uses, transformations & names over time. Yep old bread.
But you will see that this will make planning extremely efficient.

Some products will just have very common uses if in combination with other products.
Every house. So we will also have to describe products in combination with each other

You say this is way too much for everybody & not just the average consumer.
But what do you think do we do all day long as we made everything automatic?
Yes: administration & research. With this currency i write about here.

And yes, it is, with the way to look at it today, way too much for everyone,
but we are capable of summaries, so we do not always repeat every analysis.
Consumer Protection Act’s will help out there, too.
-Also, this is not something we will ‘run into tomorrow & everything will be different’.
It is a currency system, which will evolve seperately to our current money system.

First people who are very careful will buy this currency
& then more & more people will see, it is better than any gold.
& with more people entering this, they will start to describe what they need more & more exactly.
& this will slowly transform every consumer to an expert in what they need.

They don’t even have to understand all the science, but they can see the effects of the product
& see that there is something they need & no details which obstruct to satisfy what they need.

The science will be peer-reviewed by every scientist who want’s to earn cash by helping society.


One „major“ issue will be, that there will almost never be the perfect product,
but not just that we as humans have capacities for a little too much or a little to less,
we even know, that if we see some detail-effects, which risk something we need in future,
that we can counteract these effects later & have to tolerate it now. Similar to medication.*

A nice side effect will be:
As we determine what the products serve for there will be main purposes & many side purposes. Ranked by their popularity of being needed. This will have a huge creativity impact to all of us.
The currency will support new ways to see products,
because we have look at them without functional fixedness.

Very different from today will be, that the currency will have a tolerance space,
because we don’t know all effects of the food we eat or encounter,
so we don’t even know exactly what we need to eat or avoid, but roughly.
The everydays life risk will be very visible to everybody & this will raise consciousness.

Extremely positive aftermaths of this will be,
-)that this will lead to more & more detailled despription of what people really need
& which products serve & represent those needs.
-)Deception & misinterpretation of feelings & products will dramatically decrease
almost to extinction.
-)People will share their experience & rate online & very distincs a „menu“ of needs,
not just by being used to it & copying what they do everyday again & again.
It’s in front of them in their everyday life, looking at it very easily,
which makes it much more likely to look critically at it.
Far away from abstract numbers & prices.
Thinking about their future needs in a very realistic & tangible way,
makes us care about our futrure.

-)Compensation will be so real.
Products will not always match exactly what we need,
they will have most of the time some „side effects“ or more effects than needed.
Too little is also possible but it is not what we need, so we can demand compensation.

-)Impact on research.
*For ‘the „detail risk effects“, we didn’t buy first with the currency but couldn’t avoid them’,
we will get as compensation a need satisfaction currency, which counteracts this effect.

If there is no such product available we will be able to buy research for this.
One Question i asked myself:
How will we exchange the currency?
One need against another need?
Maybe rather:
What we can give & what others can give (α) against what we need & others need (Ω)

I know we are ration, exchange rate & price obsessed & want to know it now but wait & read
I will answer that now:

What we can give is possible to determine, because we have limits in time & energy.
We have reasons why we are limited so we can push it if we research.
Those methods will obviously also serve as products.
If we are restricted in energy & time by causes there are reasons too
& if we really prove that there is a restriction, we can start to figure out how to surpass it,
but first stop to demand more from this person than it can serve.
& actually failure of serving proves restriction.

This will limit our supply of products so drastically,
that it is possible to determine the best position for everyone of us in society, by software,
so we can serve the most & get as exactly as possible what we really need the same time.
This is just a process to allocate ressources and needs & calculate which investments are the most secure the most helpful to satisfy as many needs of each other as possible & to surpass our limits.
So we can love to serve for society & humanity.

So ideas, how a product can serve or what we really need, will be crucial,
because they can shift the whole system.
So the open-source & validation of these ideas is crucial too.

If an idea is realizable or not, will have to be proven by ourselves,
by everybody who has the ressources & time.
So everybody is a researcher.

The best composition of who should work what & who should do & give what
can be determined by needs fulfilled as far & free time gained to research as much as possible,
to surpass limits of knowlegde, which limit our existence & well being of humanity
as much as possible, scientifically determined as possible.

So there is everything set. Just let’s go there now.

How to make this real now?

α)People will determine what the products can satisfy. As scintifically as possible.
Ω)People will determine what they need. As scientifically as possible.

Nations have to follow this ideal, starting to create the software,
start to issue some of those currencies,
with first rather categorical needs, which will be fulfilled.
So it starts, as government security like paperwork.

This paperwork will guarantee that the nation will serve as asked the Ω-part of the currency.

The α-part of the currency will be determined at the moment the currency will be exchanged again for money or real products. So the products can change over time. The needs don’t.

A now obvious special issue, as this currency starts to exist is this:

If we first issue the currency & afterwards will be a technological developement
& we create way better products, Imagine it’s about a house.sp

Will the currency now allow us to get the new better products?
Here we can argue, but i would say ‘yes of course‘. Because:

To provide substandard is hardly possible without definitions of needs getting violated.
Even if, it might not even be possible anymore to get a substandard product like that.

„Substandard and standard“ are the words we looked for.

With these words we can define, which side effects certain products will have,
due to „the standard“ or maybe above standard & maybe some effects even beyond any standard.

Ultimately there can be a RATIO-DETERMINATION of what is above standard or standard.
Just Compare the historical price ratio & the ressource based affordability with ‘super future today’ & define roughly what is above standard or maybe even substand or what you defined.

(Let’s say cars got soundfree & drive by themselves already. For 6 people needed, big family.
It’s standard that every kid has an app on it’s phone with which the car is called & drives to our place, but it costs, all of this will be for example paid too.)
(if there is now a certain feature in this car, let’s say massage on every seat & it isn’t standard.
Now if an above-standard related to comfort was defined, this will probably be it. But there remains choice. If not, you have to earn it additionally
If we say there are additional risks which concern everyone:
Nations will have to make a „standard-clause“ too,
where a certain amount of additional risks is seen as innocuous for fulfilling the contract.
This also needs hard definition.

The mechanism that there will be an addition to the old definitions done because research found new informations about a product will lead to the the economic effect that people will just buy if they really need, & exchange the money for what they need more,
because 1) the money could get more worth the more time goes by & research is done.
2) the product we would have gotten could get very bad, because they found additional risk in it.#

This reminds me again of compensation to surpass the limitations
for society/humanity which these threats or risks represent

There# you see we need subsequent addition ‘of risks we didn’t know about earlier’ to our system of limitations of human life & ressources.
There will be no normal conpensation
but a contribution of ressources to deal with the problem at hand
related to their priority to humanity.

Compensations & these contributions to surpass inhibiting risks of products,
which we didn’t know about, are distributed as possible.
If the risk is really relevant than ressources are taken from those who can help the most.

As you see by now
With this at hand the impact of production will be described too, as side-effect.
The way how our product started to exist will be also easily traceable

So these days there will be 2 types of documents, α & Ω,
which determine how we exchange just one of them (Ω).

α)The product description & all possible uses. They will be in an archive decentral and central.
So everybody has all of the information & an update will be distributed to everybody immediately. It is fake secured as possible, by immediate prove.
So everybody knows every offer. Quantity, Quality.
There are Qualities & it’s quantities of the product,
which exist to very likely answer a need, some to be used in combinations or rare uses.

) The actual currency, defined in needs, which are split, added, mixed & traded.
Backed & integrated into an individual plan,
of what I need as an unique person
as approximate to reality as possible as far thought as possible.
These information get permanent updates from scientific findings and get adapted to our special physiology.
Also backed by an environment plan to check products and unique unknown ressources
as another guide to help each other, also updated by local, yourself & ppl engaged into these places.

And as you see by now, the currency, needs to be more and more, because we will find more and more needs as we will get more and more people.

So by which rule does the Ω currency start to exist & how is it distributed?
Later in future If there is no money to exchange for it?

Maybe like with our currency,
so the person can give us, so we create money for it, so it can live to give us,
what it proves to be able to.
But not created centrally, but in a democratic process, a decentral process.
We will determine that we need someone like this & can care for someone like this.

Actually we will invite him into our society and are willing to care for this prson,
so give it currency to exchange for products, we produced to make it live
& give it opportinúnities we produced, to make it give us back. A reciprocity.
Because we can give far more than we need if we use technology of today.
So everyone who is willing to help himself and us the same moment without damaging him or us,
as this person is willing to research and administrate all of the above, this person is welcome.
Make damage impossible & make exceeding resiprocity the norm, so we can plan far into the future or at least as far as we can and research more and more.

But just if we have enough for everyone.
If not, we first have to find a solution with him,
because we can’t sacrifice someone lese for his sake. This would be nonsense.
Except if this person proves better than another person of our society,
this person will take the other persons rank in ressource distribution.

But to be honest, this will not be very bad,
because future ressources will be:

-ultra lots of time
-more rarely making service on the big machines who produce everything for everyone,
-who gets the better research equipment & harder tasks,

and when it comes to these terms,
then those people will accept happily that just the best get the hardest cases to work with!


spTo define where we will need a house is extremelx hard. So we can define a uncertainty range &
a probability of where it will be. The surrounding also provides needs which need to be defined too. That is the reason why need defining is so extremely more potent than asking guarantee for a certain product, because this way we will be able to be more flexible related to technology place & time.

öI thought it should be possible to upgrade those currencies up to everything we need
& maximum to everything we could need, So we can make an experiment of what might be needed.
Also to split a part of them off, so you can trade it against another need.
(This has to be restricted somehow because then you could sell everything off from your house need pack until it still is a house as you wish it but you sold every addiitioonal need off, so you made money other peoples got useless parts & the guaranteeing nation still can’t find something else than a house which is logivally useful as your definitions are now diminished.
So you made cash without losing your product.)
Don’t fear personal freedom could not exist, due to this scientification.
A roughly described goal of this society is being able to do everything we feel for doing so,
without hurting us or others.